Pacific Phonograph Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co.

225 F. 500, 140 C.C.A. 542, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2121
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 9, 1915
DocketNo. 2518
StatusPublished

This text of 225 F. 500 (Pacific Phonograph Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pacific Phonograph Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co., 225 F. 500, 140 C.C.A. 542, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2121 (9th Cir. 1915).

Opinion

WOLVERTON, District Judge.

This case is akin to that of Sherman, Clay & Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co., 225 Fed. 497, —- C. C. A. -, just decided. The appellant purchased from Tilomas A. Edison, Incorporated. The latter company has also been sued by appellee in New Jersey. Neither company is a manufacturer of the infringing devices. The appellant petitioned for an injunction, the same as the defendant in the Sherman, Clay & Co. Case, mafc lug like allegations as to the seller being annoyed, harassed, etc., and the district court denied the injunction. The causes being of the same nature, the decision in the Sherman, Clay & Co. Case is decisive of this.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sherman, Clay & Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co.
225 F. 497 (Ninth Circuit, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 F. 500, 140 C.C.A. 542, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacific-phonograph-co-v-searchlight-horn-co-ca9-1915.