Pacific Phonograph Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co.

Ninth Circuit

Pacific Phonograph Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co.

225 F. 500, 140 C.C.A. 542, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2121

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 9, 1915·No. No. 2518·Published

Opinion

WOLVERTON, District Judge.

This case is akin to that of Sherman, Clay & Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co., 225 Fed. 497, —- C. C. A. -, just decided. The appellant purchased from Tilomas A. Edison, Incorporated. The latter company has also been sued by appellee in New Jersey. Neither company is a manufacturer of the infringing devices. The appellant petitioned for an injunction, the same as the defendant in the Sherman, Clay & Co. Case, mafc lug like allegations as to the seller being annoyed, harassed, etc., and the district court denied the injunction. The causes being of the same nature, the decision in the Sherman, Clay & Co. Case is decisive of this.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOLVERTON, District Judge.

This case is akin to that of Sherman, Clay & Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co., 225 Fed. 497, —- C. C. A. -, just decided. The appellant purchased from Tilomas A. Edison, Incorporated. The latter company has also been sued by appellee in New Jersey. Neither company is a manufacturer of the infringing devices. The appellant petitioned for an injunction, the same as the defendant in the Sherman, Clay & Co. Case, mafc lug like allegations as to the seller being annoyed, harassed, etc., and the district court denied the injunction. The causes being of the same nature, the decision in the Sherman, Clay & Co. Case is decisive of this.

Affirmed.

Pacific Phonograph Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co., 225 F. 500, 140 C.C.A. 542, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2121 (9th Cir. 1915).

Pincite

225 F. 500 (Pacific Phonograph Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related