Pacific Orient Co. v. United States

Customs and Patent Appeals

Pacific Orient Co. v. United States

12 Ct. Cust. 138, 1924 CCPA LEXIS 28

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·Decided March 3, 1924·No. No. 2279·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MartiN, Presiding Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from a so-called re-reappraisement of imported merchandise made by a board of three general appraisers in proceedings begun under the tariff act of 1913 and concluded under that of 1922. The case has been submitted"at present upon a motion of the Government for a dismissal of the appeal. The issue is identical in principle with that decided concurrently herewith by this court in the case of Scaramelli v. United States (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 134; T. D. 40056). Consistently with that decision the Government’s motion is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MartiN, Presiding Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from a so-called re-reappraisement of imported merchandise made by a board of three general appraisers in proceedings begun under the tariff act of 1913 and concluded under that of 1922. The case has been submitted"at present upon a motion of the Government for a dismissal of the appeal. The issue is identical in principle with that decided concurrently herewith by this court in the case of Scaramelli v. United States (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 134; T. D. 40056). Consistently with that decision the Government’s motion is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed.

Pacific Orient Co. v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. 138, 1924 CCPA LEXIS 28 (ccpa 1924).

Pincite

12 Ct. Cust. 138 (Pacific Orient Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related