Pacific Orient Co. v. Superior Court

203 Cal. 797
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 16, 1928
DocketS. F. No. 12825
StatusPublished

This text of 203 Cal. 797 (Pacific Orient Co. v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pacific Orient Co. v. Superior Court, 203 Cal. 797 (Cal. 1928).

Opinion

THE COURT.

Application for a writ of prohibi tion directing the respondent Superior Court to desist from further proceedings in an action brought to compel the petitioner here to submit a dispute or controversy to arbitration pursuant to the terms of the contract entered into before the present law on arbitration became effective. (Code Civ. Proc., secs. 1280 et seq., Stats. 1927, page 404.) The petition is denied on the authority of In the Matter of the Application of Berkovitz v. Arbib & Houlberg, 230 N. Y. 261 [130 N. E. 288]; Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co., 264 U. S. 109 [68 L. Ed. 582, 44 Sup. Ct. Rep. 174]. (All concur.)

Rehearing denied.

All the Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.
264 U.S. 109 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib Houlberg
130 N.E. 288 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 Cal. 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacific-orient-co-v-superior-court-cal-1928.