Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip

Supreme Court

Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip

493 U.S. 1014, 110 S. Ct. 710

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 8, 1990·No. No. A-452·Published

Opinion

Application for stay, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, granted, and it is ordered that execution and enforcement of the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama, case No. 87-482, is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is denied, this order terminates automatically. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be granted, this order is to remain in effect pending the issuance of the mandate of this Court. This order is further conditioned upon the supersedeas bond presently posted with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, Civil Action No. CV-82-2453, remaining in effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application for stay, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, granted, and it is ordered that execution and enforcement of the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama, case No. 87-482, is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is denied, this order terminates automatically. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be granted, this order is to remain in effect pending the issuance of the mandate of this Court. This order is further conditioned upon the supersedeas bond presently posted with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, Civil Action No. CV-82-2453, remaining in effect.

Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip, 493 U.S. 1014, 110 S. Ct. 710 (1990).

Pincite

493 U.S. 1014 (Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.