Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip

493 U.S. 1014
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 8, 1990
DocketNo. A-452
StatusPublished

This text of 493 U.S. 1014 (Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip, 493 U.S. 1014 (1990).

Opinion

Application for stay, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, granted, and it is ordered that execution and enforcement of the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama, case No. 87-482, is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is denied, this order terminates automatically. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be granted, this order is to remain in effect pending the issuance of the mandate of this Court. This order is further conditioned upon the supersedeas bond presently posted with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, Civil Action No. CV-82-2453, remaining in effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
493 U.S. 1014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacific-mutual-life-insurance-v-haslip-scotus-1990.