Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. First Republicbank Corp.

53 F.3d 1409
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 26, 1995
DocketNo. 92-1662
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 F.3d 1409 (Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. First Republicbank Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. First Republicbank Corp., 53 F.3d 1409 (5th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We reversed the judgment of the district court with opinion at 997 F.2d 39 (5th Cir. 1993), and the Supreme Court affirmed by an equally divided vote. Our mandate has not been issued to the district court. The Supreme Court has now held § 27A(b) to be an unconstitutional breach of separation of powers. Plant v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 1447, 131 L.Ed.2d 328 (1995). Under that decision the claims of plaintiff are barred, and the district court would be unable to do more than repeat its prior judgment. Therefore, our opinion and judgment are vacated, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 F.3d 1409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacific-mutual-life-insurance-v-first-republicbank-corp-ca5-1995.