Pacific Marine Products Co. v. Fish & Game Commission

California Court of Appeal

Pacific Marine Products Co. v. Fish & Game Commission

75 Cal. App. 791

California Court of Appeal·Decided December 23, 1925·No. Civ. No. 5250·Published

Opinion

HOUSER, J.

The pleadings, the facts, the relief sought by the petitioner, and the contentions of respective counsel in all essential particulars are identical with those set forth in the case of Van Camp Sea Food Co., Inc., v. Fish and Game Commission, ante, p. 764 [243 Pac. 702]. Rely[792]*792ing upon that ease as an authority, it is ordered that the demurrer to the petition he and it is sustained, and that the writ heretofore issued herein be and the same is discharged.

Conrey, P. J., and Curtis, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOUSER, J.

The pleadings, the facts, the relief sought by the petitioner, and the contentions of respective counsel in all essential particulars are identical with those set forth in the case of Van Camp Sea Food Co., Inc., v. Fish and Game Commission, ante, p. 764 [243 Pac. 702]. Rely[792]*792ing upon that ease as an authority, it is ordered that the demurrer to the petition he and it is sustained, and that the writ heretofore issued herein be and the same is discharged.

Conrey, P. J., and Curtis, J., concurred.

Pacific Marine Products Co. v. Fish & Game Commission, 75 Cal. App. 791 (Cal. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

75 Cal. App. 791 (Pacific Marine Products Co. v. Fish & Game Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related