Pacific Marine Products Co. v. Fish and Game Comm.

243 P. 705, 75 Cal. App. 791
California Court of Appeal·Decided December 23, 1925·No. Docket No. 5250.·Published

Opinion

The pleadings, the facts, the relief sought by the petitioner, and the contentions of respective counsel in all essential particulars are identical with those set forth in the case ofVan Camp Sea Food Co., Inc., v. Fish and Game Commission,ante, p. 764 [243 P. 702]. [1] Relying *Page 792 upon that case as an authority, it is ordered that the demurrer to the petition be and it is sustained, and that the writ heretofore issued herein be and the same is discharged.

Conrey, P.J., and Curtis, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pacific Marine Products Co. v. Fish and Game Comm., 243 P. 705, 75 Cal. App. 791 (Cal. Ct. App. 1925).

243 P. 705 (Pacific Marine Products Co. v. Fish and Game Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Camp Sea Food Co. v. Fish & Game Commission
243 P. 702 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)