Pacific Marine Insurance Company v. Walter E. Clark, and Christopher Fulton, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant

Ninth Circuit

Pacific Marine Insurance Company v. Walter E. Clark, and Christopher Fulton, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant

942 F.2d 793, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26237, 1991 WL 170023

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 5, 1991·No. 89-35172·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
PACIFIC MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Walter E. CLARK, et al., Defendants,
and
Christopher Fulton, Defendant-intervenor-Appellant.

No. 89-35172.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 22, 1991.
Decided Sept. 5, 1991.

Before TANG, REINHARDT and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

Because appellee Pacific Marine Insurance Company has approved the claim of appellant Fulton, this appeal is moot. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand with a direction to dismiss. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39 (1950).

VACATED and REMANDED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

942 F.2d 793

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
PACIFIC MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Walter E. CLARK, et al., Defendants,
and
Christopher Fulton, Defendant-intervenor-Appellant.

No. 89-35172.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 22, 1991.
Decided Sept. 5, 1991.

Before TANG, REINHARDT and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

Because appellee Pacific Marine Insurance Company has approved the claim of appellant Fulton, this appeal is moot. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand with a direction to dismiss. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39 (1950).

VACATED and REMANDED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Pacific Marine Insurance Company v. Walter E. Clark, and Christopher Fulton, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant, 942 F.2d 793, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26237, 1991 WL 170023 (9th Cir. 1991).

Pincite

942 F.2d 793 (Pacific Marine Insurance Company v. Walter E. Clark, and Christopher Fulton, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related