Pacific Land Ass'n v. Hunt
38 P. 635, 105 Cal. 202, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 1136
Opinion
This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent to settle what is claimed to be a bill of exceptions. We agree with the respondent that the instrument submitted does not show an attempt to present such a fair and bona fide statement of the case as entitles it to be considered and settled as a bill of exceptions.
The prayer of the petitioner is denied, and the petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pacific Land Ass'n v. Hunt, 38 P. 635, 105 Cal. 202, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 1136 (Cal. 1894).
38 P. 635 (Pacific Land Ass'n v. Hunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nichols v. Smith
76 P.2d 525 (California Court of Appeal, 1938)
Dainty Pretzel Co. v. Superior Court
45 P.2d 817 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Derr v. Busick
218 P. 280 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)