Pacific Insurance v. Hodgkinson

14 A.D.2d 752, 220 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8438

Opinion

The complaint violates the provisions of section 241 of the Civil Practice Act in failing to contain a plain and concise statement of the material facts. Instead it contains a detailed recital of the evidentiary facts upon which, presumably, plaintiff intends to rely. Moreover, the complaint in alleging in its twenty-third paragraph that plaintiff denies liability under its policy upon grounds, “ among others ”, that defendant Paul Hodgkinson was not a resident of the household of the named insured fails to tender an issue which would be determinative of the liabilities between the parties. This does not satisfy the requirements in an action for declaratory judgment (Smith v. Western Union Tel. Co., 276 App. Div. 210, 213, affd. 302 N. Y. 683). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pacific Insurance v. Hodgkinson, 14 A.D.2d 752, 220 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8438 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

14 A.D.2d 752 (Pacific Insurance v. Hodgkinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
98 N.E.2d 482 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)