Home/California Court of Appeal/Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Ct., Los Angeles

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Ct., Los Angeles

283 P. 347, 102 Cal. App. 797
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 16, 1929
DocketDocket No. 6841.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 283 P. 347 (Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Ct., Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Ct., Los Angeles, 283 P. 347, 102 Cal. App. 797 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

On writ of review of a summary judgment entered upon forfeiture of a bail bond. [1] The grounds upon which petitioner claims that the judgment should be annulled are included in the questions which have been discussed in our Civil No. 6799,Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court et al., ante, p. 566 [283 P. 345], in which the decision has been this day filed. We think that the respondent court acted within, and not in excess of, its jurisdiction.

The judgment is affirmed.

Houser, J., and York, J., concurred.

*Page 798

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ross
221 Cal. App. 2d 443 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 P. 347, 102 Cal. App. 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacific-indemnity-co-v-municipal-ct-los-angeles-calctapp-1929.