Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Ct., Los Angeles
283 P. 347, 102 Cal. App. 797
California Court of Appeal·Decided December 16, 1929·No. Docket No. 6841.·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
On writ of review of a summary judgment entered upon forfeiture of a bail bond. [1] The grounds upon which petitioner claims that the judgment should be annulled are included in the questions which have been discussed in our Civil No. 6799,Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court et al., ante, p. 566 [
The judgment is affirmed.
*Page 798Houser, J., and York, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Ct., Los Angeles, 283 P. 347, 102 Cal. App. 797 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).
283 P. 347 (Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Ct., Los Angeles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Ross
221 Cal. App. 2d 443 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)