Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Court
102 Cal. App. 797
Opinion
On writ of review of a summary judgment entered upon forfeiture of a bail bond. The grounds upon which petitioner claims that the judgment should be annulled are included in the questions which have been discussed in our Civil No. 6799, Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court et al., ante, p. 566 [283 Pac. 345], in which the decision has been this day filed. We think that the respondent court acted within, and not in excess of, its jurisdiction.
The judgment is affirmed.
Houser, J., and York, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Court, 102 Cal. App. 797 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).
102 Cal. App. 797 (Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Ross
221 Cal. App. 2d 443 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)