Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Court
This text of 102 Cal. App. 797 (Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On writ of review of a summary judgment entered upon forfeiture of a bail bond. The grounds upon which petitioner claims that the judgment should be annulled are included in the questions which have been discussed in our Civil No. 6799, Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court et al., ante, p. 566 [283 Pac. 345], in which the decision has been this day filed. We think that the respondent court acted within, and not in excess of, its jurisdiction.
The judgment is affirmed.
Houser, J., and York, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 Cal. App. 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacific-indemnity-co-v-municipal-court-calctapp-1929.