Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Deshotel

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Deshotel

121 So. 2d 311, 1960 La. App. LEXIS 1012

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 31, 1960

DocketNo. 5037

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 121 So. 2d 311 (Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Deshotel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Deshotel, 121 So. 2d 311, 1960 La. App. LEXIS 1012 (La. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

SAVOY, Judge ad hoc.

This case involves the companion case of Sheridan et al. v. Deshotel et al., 121 So.2d 30S consolidated for purposes of trial, which decision has been handed down by this Court this day. It is a claim by Pacific Indemnity Company, the subrogee of William J. Sheridan, for damages sustained in the accident set out in the case of Sheridan et al. v. Deshotel et al. On the trial in the lower court, it was agreed that the judgment sustained by William J. Sheridan totaled the sum of $703.45. Pacific Indemnity Company, as the collision insurer of William J. Sheridan, paid this amount to him, and he has subrogated his claim to them.

For the reasons set out in the case of Sheridan et al. v. Deshotel et al., the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAVOY, Judge ad hoc.

This case involves the companion case of Sheridan et al. v. Deshotel et al., 121 So.2d 30S consolidated for purposes of trial, which decision has been handed down by this Court this day. It is a claim by Pacific Indemnity Company, the subrogee of William J. Sheridan, for damages sustained in the accident set out in the case of Sheridan et al. v. Deshotel et al. On the trial in the lower court, it was agreed that the judgment sustained by William J. Sheridan totaled the sum of $703.45. Pacific Indemnity Company, as the collision insurer of William J. Sheridan, paid this amount to him, and he has subrogated his claim to them.

For the reasons set out in the case of Sheridan et al. v. Deshotel et al., the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 So. 2d 311, 1960 La. App. LEXIS 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacific-indemnity-co-v-deshotel-lactapp-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack