Pacific Finance Corporation v. Vern Coggle

Tenth Circuit

Pacific Finance Corporation v. Vern Coggle

209 F.2d 263

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedDecember 7, 1953

Docket4748_1

StatusPublished

This text of 209 F.2d 263 (Pacific Finance Corporation v. Vern Coggle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pacific Finance Corporation v. Vern Coggle, 209 F.2d 263 (10th Cir. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

209 F.2d 263

PACIFIC FINANCE CORPORATION
v.
Vern COGGLE.

No. 4748.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

December 7, 1953.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah.

Louis H. Callister, E. R. Callister, Jr., and Nathan J. Fullmer, Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellant.

Glen S. Hatch, Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed pursuant to stipulation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

209 F.2d 263

PACIFIC FINANCE CORPORATION
v.
Vern COGGLE.

No. 4748.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

December 7, 1953.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah.

Louis H. Callister, E. R. Callister, Jr., and Nathan J. Fullmer, Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellant.

Glen S. Hatch, Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed pursuant to stipulation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 F.2d 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacific-finance-corporation-v-vern-coggle-ca10-1953.