Pacific Electricord Company v. National Labor Relations Board

361 F.2d 310, 63 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2064, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6380
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 26, 1966
Docket20276
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 361 F.2d 310 (Pacific Electricord Company v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pacific Electricord Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 361 F.2d 310, 63 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2064, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6380 (9th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon an examination of the whole record we conclude that there was substantial evidence from which the Board could infer that the activities leading to the employee’s discharge were engaged in with or on behalf of other employees, and not solely by and on behalf of the discharged employee himself, and thus were “concerted activities for the purpose of * * mutual aid or protection” within the meaning of section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, protected by section 8 (a) (1) of the Act.

The order of the Board will be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
361 F.2d 310, 63 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2064, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacific-electricord-company-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca9-1966.