Pacific Dry Goods Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Pacific Dry Goods Co. v. United States

21 Cust. Ct. 190, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 581

United States Customs Court·Decided August 13, 1948·No. No. 52495; protest 78451-K (San Francisco)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the articles in question are not chiefly used for the amusement of children and that they are manufactures in chief value of wood. Upon the record presented it was held that the merchandise covered by items HW 80 in case No. 2175, items HW 95 in case No. 2176, and items 899 and 900 in case No. 2198 is properly dutiable at 33% percent under paragraph 412, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the articles in question are not chiefly used for the amusement of children and that they are manufactures in chief value of wood. Upon the record presented it was held that the merchandise covered by items HW 80 in case No. 2175, items HW 95 in case No. 2176, and items 899 and 900 in case No. 2198 is properly dutiable at 33% percent under paragraph 412, as claimed.

Pacific Dry Goods Co. v. United States, 21 Cust. Ct. 190, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 581 (cusc 1948).

Pincite

21 Cust. Ct. 190 (Pacific Dry Goods Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.