Pacific Bridge Co. v. Kirkham

2 P. 409, 64 Cal. 519, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 416
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 31, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 P. 409 (Pacific Bridge Co. v. Kirkham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pacific Bridge Co. v. Kirkham, 2 P. 409, 64 Cal. 519, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 416 (Cal. 1884).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The principal point argued by counsel for appellant is that, under the principle established by the case of People v. Lynch, 51 Cal. 15, the act of the legislature entitled “an act to authorize the city of Oakland to construct a bridge across the estuary of San Antonio, between Eighth Street and East Ninth Street,” approved April 1, 1876, is unconstitutional and void. To this we are unable to assent. Nor can we say that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the findings of the court below.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Hearing in Bank denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation District
28 P. 272 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
Lent v. Tillson
14 P. 71 (California Supreme Court, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 P. 409, 64 Cal. 519, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacific-bridge-co-v-kirkham-cal-1884.