Pacific Bridge Co. v. Kirkham
This text of 2 P. 409 (Pacific Bridge Co. v. Kirkham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The principal point argued by counsel for appellant is that, under the principle established by the case of People v. Lynch, 51 Cal. 15, the act of the legislature entitled “an act to authorize the city of Oakland to construct a bridge across the estuary of San Antonio, between Eighth Street and East Ninth Street,” approved April 1, 1876, is unconstitutional and void. To this we are unable to assent. Nor can we say that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the findings of the court below.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Hearing in Bank denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 P. 409, 64 Cal. 519, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacific-bridge-co-v-kirkham-cal-1884.