Pacific Aircorp 21632, Inc. v. Ramiz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pacific Aircorp 21632, Inc. v. Ramiz

2 So. 3d 1085, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1038, 2009 WL 321594

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 2009·No. 3D08-1133·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Applying any conceivable standard of review, see Ryder Sys., Inc. v. Davis, 997 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), there is nothing in the record to support any of the elements of the forum non conveniens doctrine, see Kinney Sys., Inc. v. Cont’l Ins. Co., 674 So.2d 86 (Fla.1996), let alone, as is required, all of them. See Telemundo Network Group, LLC v. Azteca Int’l Corp., 957 So.2d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Therefore, the order dismissing the case on that basis is reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Applying any conceivable standard of review, see Ryder Sys., Inc. v. Davis, 997 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), there is nothing in the record to support any of the elements of the forum non conveniens doctrine, see Kinney Sys., Inc. v. Cont’l Ins. Co., 674 So.2d 86 (Fla.1996), let alone, as is required, all of them. See Telemundo Network Group, LLC v. Azteca Int’l Corp., 957 So.2d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Therefore, the order dismissing the case on that basis is reversed.

Reversed.

Pacific Aircorp 21632, Inc. v. Ramiz, 2 So. 3d 1085, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1038, 2009 WL 321594 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

2 So. 3d 1085 (Pacific Aircorp 21632, Inc. v. Ramiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related