Paciello v. Ariola
This text of 130 A.D.2d 640 (Paciello v. Ariola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a dental malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated June 27, 1986, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) on the ground of arbitration and award.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court, Kings County, that this case is controlled by our decision in Sartiano v Becker (119 AD2d 656, lv dismissed 68 NY2d 806; see also, Nastasi v Artenberg, 130 AD2d 469). Lawrence, J. P., Fiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 A.D.2d 640, 515 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paciello-v-ariola-nyappdiv-1987.