Pachivas v. General Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pachivas v. General Insurance Co.

411 So. 2d 228, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19279

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 16, 1982

DocketNo. 81-369

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 411 So. 2d 228 (Pachivas v. General Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pachivas v. General Insurance Co., 411 So. 2d 228, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19279 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment entered after a trial on the merits in favor of General Insurance Company. §§ 627.409 and 627.732(4), Fla.Stat. (1979); Life Insurance Company of Virginia v. Shifflet, 201 So.2d 715 (Fla.1967); Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Koven, 402 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); New York Life Insurance Company v. Nespereira, 366 So.2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). See Travelers Insurance Company v. Zimmerman, 309 So.2d 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Compare Gaskins v. General Insurance Company of Florida, 397 So.2d 729 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) (insured’s contentions, inter alia, that she told agent that son, a licensed driver, was living at home, but had his own automobile which was insured, and that agent advised son’s name did not have to be. listed on application, presented material issues of fact precluding entry of summary judgment for insurer).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment entered after a trial on the merits in favor of General Insurance Company. §§ 627.409 and 627.732(4), Fla.Stat. (1979); Life Insurance Company of Virginia v. Shifflet, 201 So.2d 715 (Fla.1967); Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Koven, 402 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); New York Life Insurance Company v. Nespereira, 366 So.2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). See Travelers Insurance Company v. Zimmerman, 309 So.2d 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Compare Gaskins v. General Insurance Company of Florida, 397 So.2d 729 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) (insured’s contentions, inter alia, that she told agent that son, a licensed driver, was living at home, but had his own automobile which was insured, and that agent advised son’s name did not have to be. listed on application, presented material issues of fact precluding entry of summary judgment for insurer).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

411 So. 2d 228, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pachivas-v-general-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack