Pacher v. Stechmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pacher v. Stechmann

176 A.D. 894

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 176 A.D. 894 (Pacher v. Stechmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pacher v. Stechmann, 176 A.D. 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to plaintiff to renew her application for the examination of the defendant before trial upon her own affidavit setting forth the facts showing her ignorance of her real pathological condition at the time the defendant operated upon her, and of what treatment he really gave her, and her inability to establish those facts by any other direct testimony than that of the defendant. Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to plaintiff to renew her application for the examination of the defendant before trial upon her own affidavit setting forth the facts showing her ignorance of her real pathological condition at the time the defendant operated upon her, and of what treatment he really gave her, and her inability to establish those facts by any other direct testimony than that of the defendant. Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 A.D. 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacher-v-stechmann-nyappdiv-1916.