Pacheco v. Weybosset Pure Food Market

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Pacheco v. Weybosset Pure Food Market

9 R.I. Dec. 128

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided February 7, 1933·No. No. 88499; No. 88498; No. 90139·Published

Opinion

DECISION.

SUMNER, J.

Manuel Pacheco and the driver of the Weybosset Pure Food Market truck both approached the street intersection at too great a speed. Clara Pacheco was guilty of contributory negligence in joining her husband in singing as they approached a blind corner.

Decision for the defendant in each case.

For Weybosset Pure Pood Market: Quinn, Kernan & Quinn. For Pachecos: O’Brien, Corrigan & Boyle. For Pacheco in 90139: McMahon & Tiernan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION.

SUMNER, J.

Manuel Pacheco and the driver of the Weybosset Pure Food Market truck both approached the street intersection at too great a speed. Clara Pacheco was guilty of contributory negligence in joining her husband in singing as they approached a blind corner.

Decision for the defendant in each case.

For Weybosset Pure Pood Market: Quinn, Kernan & Quinn. For Pachecos: O’Brien, Corrigan & Boyle. For Pacheco in 90139: McMahon & Tiernan.

Pacheco v. Weybosset Pure Food Market, 9 R.I. Dec. 128 (R.I. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

9 R.I. Dec. 128 (Pacheco v. Weybosset Pure Food Market) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.