Pacheco v. Weybosset Pure Food Market

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Pacheco v. Weybosset Pure Food Market

9 R.I. Dec. 128

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedFebruary 7, 1933

DocketNo. 88499; No. 88498; No. 90139

StatusPublished

This text of 9 R.I. Dec. 128 (Pacheco v. Weybosset Pure Food Market) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pacheco v. Weybosset Pure Food Market, 9 R.I. Dec. 128 (R.I. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION.

SUMNER, J.

Manuel Pacheco and the driver of the Weybosset Pure Food Market truck both approached the street intersection at too great a speed. Clara Pacheco was guilty of contributory negligence in joining her husband in singing as they approached a blind corner.

Decision for the defendant in each case.

For Weybosset Pure Pood Market: Quinn, Kernan & Quinn. For Pachecos: O’Brien, Corrigan & Boyle. For Pacheco in 90139: McMahon & Tiernan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION.

SUMNER, J.

Manuel Pacheco and the driver of the Weybosset Pure Food Market truck both approached the street intersection at too great a speed. Clara Pacheco was guilty of contributory negligence in joining her husband in singing as they approached a blind corner.

Decision for the defendant in each case.

For Weybosset Pure Pood Market: Quinn, Kernan & Quinn. For Pachecos: O’Brien, Corrigan & Boyle. For Pacheco in 90139: McMahon & Tiernan.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 R.I. Dec. 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacheco-v-weybosset-pure-food-market-risuperct-1933.