Pacheco v. State

697 So. 2d 1288, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9311, 1997 WL 464694
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pacheco v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 698 So. 2d 593
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 15, 1997·No. No. 96-2043·Published

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence in a murder case. Appellant had four or five different lawyers appointed to represent him through the trial. He would get a lawyer, become dissatisfied with him or her and cause the lawyer to be discharged and another appointed. After trial he filed a bar grievance against his last lawyer and the court became aware of this at sentencing. The judge discharged the final lawyer at the sentencing hearing and sentenced appellant within the sentencing guidelines.

While we are sympathetic with the judge’s frustration and understand the probable fruitlessness of the result, we must vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing after the reappointment of his last lawyer or the appointment of a new one. State v. Young, 626 So.2d 655 (Fla.1993); Chestnut v. State, 578 So.2d 27 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

W. SHARP and HARRIS, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pacheco v. State, 697 So. 2d 1288, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9311, 1997 WL 464694 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

697 So. 2d 1288 (Pacheco v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chestnut v. State
578 So. 2d 27 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State v. Young
626 So. 2d 655 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)