Pacheco v. State
613 So. 2d 617, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2699, 1993 WL 52988
This text of 613 So. 2d 617 (Pacheco v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pacheco v. State, 613 So. 2d 617, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2699, 1993 WL 52988 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
Opinion
Affirmed. Appellant, Pacheco, is procedurally barred from raising a new claim in his second rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief since he has failed to demonstrate why he was unable to raise this claim in his first rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Bertolotti v. State, 565 So.2d 1343, 1345 (Fla.1990); Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22, 24 (Fla.1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Christopher v. State
489 So. 2d 22 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Bertolotti v. State
565 So. 2d 1343 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
613 So. 2d 617, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2699, 1993 WL 52988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacheco-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.