Pacheco v. Bemal
2 Cal. 150
Opinion
February 4th. On motion of Williams and Jones, for the respondents, and filing a transcript of the record, the appellant having failed to do so, and the transcript showing that the appeal was perfected November 3d, 1851, the Court ordered that the appeal be dismissed, with 10 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pacheco v. Bemal, 2 Cal. 150 (Cal. 1852).
2 Cal. 150 (Pacheco v. Bemal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Sumner
262 Cal. App. 2d 409 (California Court of Appeal, 1968)
Huber v. Shedoudy
181 P. 63 (California Supreme Court, 1919)
McFadden v. Dietz
47 P. 777 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
Garrett v. Belmont Land Co.
29 S.W. 726 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1895)