Pacer v. Pieczynski
235 A.D. 756
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1932
StatusPublished
This text of 235 A.D. 756 (Pacer v. Pieczynski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pacer v. Pieczynski, 235 A.D. 756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
-Judgment modified and as modified affirmed, with costs to appellants. Certain findings of fact and conclusions of law disapproved and reversed and new findings and conclusions made. All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacer-v-pieczynski-nyappdiv-1932.