Pace West v. Lenora West

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 14, 2006
Docket02-06-00399-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Pace West v. Lenora West (Pace West v. Lenora West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pace West v. Lenora West, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

                                      COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

                                        NO.  2-06-399-CV

PACE WEST                                                                       APPELLANT

                                                   V.

LENORA WEST                                                                      APPELLEE

                                              ------------

           FROM THE 324TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]


Appellant Pace West attempts to appeal from the trial court=s Agreed Protective Order in the underlying divorce case.  The parties= divorce proceeding remains pending and unresolved in the trial court.  Thus, the trial court=s protective order is not a final, appealable order.  See Kiefer v. Kiefer, 132 S.W.3d 601, 602 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 2004, no pet.) (holding that a protective order rendered during the pendency of a divorce is not a final judgment for purposes of appeal); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. ' 51.014 (Vernon Supp. 2006) (conferring right to appeal from certain interlocutory orders).

On November 1, 2006, we notified the parties that this appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal on or before November 13, 2006.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).  We have not received any response.

Because the trial court=s protective order is not an appealable interlocutory order, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL D:   GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED:  December 14, 2006



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kiefer v. Kiefer
132 S.W.3d 601 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pace West v. Lenora West, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pace-west-v-lenora-west-texapp-2006.