Pace v. Village of Walton Hills
This text of 238 N.E.2d 542 (Pace v. Village of Walton Hills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The absolute prohibition of the use of political signs is unconstitutional. Peltz v. South Euclid, 11 Ohio St. 2d 128. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and judgment is entered for appellant that ordinance No. 1951-3 of the village of Walton Hills, to the extent that it prohibits the use of political signs in residential districts, violates Section 11, Article I of the Constitution of Ohio, and the First and. Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States, and appellees are permanently enjoined from enforcing the ordinance to the extent of its constitutional infirmity as herein indicated.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 N.E.2d 542, 15 Ohio St. 2d 51, 44 Ohio Op. 2d 29, 1968 Ohio LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pace-v-village-of-walton-hills-ohio-1968.