Pace v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pace v. State

179 S.E. 582, 51 Ga. App. 51, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 547

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 3, 1935

Docket24638

StatusPublished

This text of 179 S.E. 582 (Pace v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pace v. State, 179 S.E. 582, 51 Ga. App. 51, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 547 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial is not argued or insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and therefore is treated as abandoned.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge and no error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere with it.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial is not argued or insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and therefore is treated as abandoned.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge and no error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere with it.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 S.E. 582, 51 Ga. App. 51, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pace-v-state-gactapp-1935.