Pace v. State
806 So. 2d 571, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 397, 2002 WL 84130
This text of 806 So. 2d 571 (Pace v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pace v. State, 806 So. 2d 571, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 397, 2002 WL 84130 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to refile a legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167, 1167 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (explaining that “[t]he allegations required by State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998) at a minimum would have to address how and where the record demonstrates entitlement to relief.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
806 So. 2d 571, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 397, 2002 WL 84130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pace-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.