Pace v. State

806 So. 2d 571, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 397, 2002 WL 84130
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 23, 2002·No. No. 4D01-3459·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to refile a legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167, 1167 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (explaining that “[t]he allegations required by State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998) at a minimum would have to address how and where the record demonstrates entitlement to relief.”).

GUNTHER, STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pace v. State, 806 So. 2d 571, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 397, 2002 WL 84130 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

806 So. 2d 571 (Pace v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)