Pace v. Provident Savings Life Assur. Soc.
This text of 113 F. 13 (Pace v. Provident Savings Life Assur. Soc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The receipt for first premium, which is the basis of this suit, does not appear to have been given or issued by a duly-authorized agent of the Provident Life Assurance Society. If considered as issued by a duly-authorized agent, and to be a binding receipt of the company, still it must be construed in connection with the application and the statements therein, and held to effect insurance upon the life of the applicant only in case the application was thereafter accepted by the society.
The decree of the circuit court seems to be in accordance with the law and the facts of the case, and it is affirmed,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 F. 13, 51 C.C.A. 32, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pace-v-provident-savings-life-assur-soc-ca5-1902.