Pace v. Haymarket Co-Operative Bank

402 U.S. 945, 29 L. Ed. 2d 113, 91 S. Ct. 1620, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2175

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 3, 1971·No. No. 1456·Published·Cited by 28 cases

Opinion

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pace v. Haymarket Co-Operative Bank, 402 U.S. 945, 29 L. Ed. 2d 113, 91 S. Ct. 1620, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2175 (1971).

Pincite

402 U.S. 945 (Pace v. Haymarket Co-Operative Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Auto Parts Manufacturing Mississippi Inc. v. King Construction of Houston, LLC

258 F. Supp. 3d 740 (N.D. Mississippi, 2017)

ePlus Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc.

946 F. Supp. 2d 472 (E.D. Virginia, 2013)

Davis v. City & County of San Francisco

890 F.2d 1438 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)

Fontaine Davis, Eric H. Washington Jerilyn North Robert L. Demmons Jimmie Braden Audry Lee Early Davis Brandi Swanson Susan Moorehead Anne Young Mary M. Carder Theresa Rodigou Kathleen J. Bradshaw Patricia Murray International Association of Black Firefighters-San Francisco Chapter United States of America v. City and County of San Francisco, a Municipal Corporation John W. Flaherty Edward E. Murphy William M. Shaughnessy Alfred E. Smyth San Francisco Firefighters, Local 798, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. United States of America, and Fontaine Davis, in Intervention/appellees v. City and County of San Francisco v. San Francisco Firefighters Local 798, in Intervention/appellant (Four Cases). Fontaine Davis v. City and County of San Francisco v. San Francisco Firefighters Local 798, in Intervention/appellant (Three Cases). Fontaine Davis v. City and County of San Francisco v. San Francisco Firefighters Local 798, in Intervention/appellant

890 F.2d 1438 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)

United States v. Reed

601 F. Supp. 685 (S.D. New York, 1985)

Litton Systems, Inc. v. Sundstrand Corporation, a Delaware Corp.

750 F.2d 952 (Federal Circuit, 1984)

Nasco, Inc. v. Calcasieu Television & Radio, Inc.

583 F. Supp. 115 (W.D. Louisiana, 1984)

Syntex Ophthalmics, Inc. v. Novicky

591 F. Supp. 28 (N.D. Illinois, 1983)

Syntex Ophthalmics, Inc. And Arapahoe Chemicals, Inc. v. George F. Tsuetaki, Fused Kontacts of Chicago, Inc. And Nick N. Novicky

701 F.2d 677 (Seventh Circuit, 1983)

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. American Train Dispatchers Ass'n

549 F. Supp. 347 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1982)

Henry Hope X-Ray Products, Inc. v. Marron Carrel, Inc., an Arizona Corporation and Karl Ungar

674 F.2d 1336 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)

Rodney W. Quinter v. Volkswagen of America, Volkswagen of Atlantic, Inc., Volkswagenwerk, A. G., Byron Bloch

676 F.2d 969 (Third Circuit, 1982)

In Re Samoset Associates

14 B.R. 408 (D. Maine, 1981)

Shamie v. City of Pontiac

515 F. Supp. 402 (E.D. Michigan, 1981)

John Zink Company, Cross-Appellant v. National Airoil Burner Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee

613 F.2d 547 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)

Erwin G. Baumer and Clara S. Baumer, Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Seven Eighty-Eight Greenwood Avenue Corporation v. United States

580 F.2d 863 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)

Baumer v. United States

580 F.2d 871 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)

San Antonio Telephone Company, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, James H. Ashley

529 F.2d 694 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)

Penn Yan Boats, Inc. v. Wollard

389 F. Supp. 1047 (S.D. Florida, 1975)

University Computing Company v. Lykes-Youngstown Corporation

504 F.2d 518 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)