Pace v. Grove
This text of 26 Ind. 26 (Pace v. Grove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint in this ease sets forth two promissory notes and a mortgage given to secure their payment, and asks for judgment and other proper relief. There is no averment that the notes were unpaid. A demurrer was filed to the complaint and was overruled. This was error. It has been ruled by this court, in the case of Lawson v. Sherra, 21 Ind. 363, that in an action upon a note the complaint, to be sufficient, should contain an averment that the note remains unpaid. The demurrer should, therefore, [27]*27have been sustained. "We do not feel it to be our duty to review the action of the court upon the answer to the complaint.
The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the court below is directed to sustain the demurrer to the complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 Ind. 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pace-v-grove-ind-1866.