Pace v. City of Birmingham
This text of 540 So. 2d 720 (Pace v. City of Birmingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Having reviewed the record, this Court concludes that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the City of Birmingham’s Rule 60(b)(6), A.R.Civ.P., motion to set aside the judgment that had previously been entered for Robert C. Pace, Jr., and in entering a judgment for the city. For these reasons, the writ is denied. See Textron, Inc. v. Whitfield, 380 So.2d 259 (Ala.1979). See, also, Adams v. Farlow, 516 So.2d 528, 557 (Ala.1987), cert. denied sub nom. Board of Operatives of the American Cast Iron Pipe Co. v. Board of Management of the American Cast Iron Pipe Co., — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1477, 99 L.Ed.2d 705 (1988).
WRIT DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
540 So. 2d 720, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 27, 1989 WL 7254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pace-v-city-of-birmingham-ala-1989.