Pace University v. New York City Commission on Human Rights

New York Court of Appeals

Pace University v. New York City Commission on Human Rights

648 N.E.2d 783, 85 N.Y.2d 831, 624 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 166

DecidedFebruary 9, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 648 N.E.2d 783 (Pace University v. New York City Commission on Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pace University v. New York City Commission on Human Rights, 648 N.E.2d 783, 85 N.Y.2d 831, 624 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 166 (N.Y. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it is made by Marsha A. Lampert purportedly on behalf of Rabbi Kushner, David Stayer and Harold N. Levinson, M.D. for leave to reargue this Court’s orders dated December 21, 1994, dismissed upon the ground that Lampert is not their authorized legal representative; motion by Marsha A. Lampert on behalf of herself, insofar as it seeks leave to reargue this Court’s order dated November 29, 1994 dismissed as untimely (22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [3]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it is made by Marsha A. Lampert purportedly on behalf of Rabbi Kushner, David Stayer and Harold N. Levinson, M.D. for leave to reargue this Court’s orders dated December 21, 1994, dismissed upon the ground that Lampert is not their authorized legal representative; motion by Marsha A. Lampert on behalf of herself, insofar as it seeks leave to reargue this Court’s order dated November 29, 1994 dismissed as untimely (22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [3]).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

648 N.E.2d 783, 85 N.Y.2d 831, 624 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pace-university-v-new-york-city-commission-on-human-rights-ny-1995.