Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Pace Pontiac, Inc. v. Milby

Pace Pontiac, Inc. v. Milby

185 So. 2d 467, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3637
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 6, 1966
DocketNo. 34543
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 185 So. 2d 467 (Pace Pontiac, Inc. v. Milby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pace Pontiac, Inc. v. Milby, 185 So. 2d 467, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3637 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the jurisdictional conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A., does not ap[468]*468pear. Therefore, the Writ must he and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and BARNS (Retired), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wagner v. City of Hialeah
462 So. 2d 482 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Maas Bros., Inc. v. Bishop
204 So. 2d 16 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 So. 2d 467, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pace-pontiac-inc-v-milby-fla-1966.