Paccar, Inc., Cleveland MacK Sales, Inc., D/B/A Performance Kenworth, Inc., and Caterpillar, Inc. v. Ho Ho Ho Express, Inc.
This text of Paccar, Inc., Cleveland MacK Sales, Inc., D/B/A Performance Kenworth, Inc., and Caterpillar, Inc. v. Ho Ho Ho Express, Inc. (Paccar, Inc., Cleveland MacK Sales, Inc., D/B/A Performance Kenworth, Inc., and Caterpillar, Inc. v. Ho Ho Ho Express, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued February 20, 2014.
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00199-CV ——————————— PACCAR, INC., CLEVELAND MACK SALES, INC. D/B/A PERFORMANCE KENWORTH, INC., AND CATERPILLAR, INC. Appellants V. HO HO HO EXPRESS, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2008-24797
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants, Cleveland Mack Sales, Inc. d/b/a Performance Kenworth Inc.
and Caterpillar, Inc., have settled their disputes with appellee Ho Ho Ho Express,
Inc. and move to dismiss their appeal and vacate the trial court’s judgment. In addition, appellee Ho Ho Ho Express, Inc. and appellant PACCAR, Inc. have
settled their dispute and jointly move to dismiss PACCAR, Inc.’s appeal. We
grant both motions.
All disputes in this case having been settled, at the parties’ request, we
vacate the trial court’s judgment and dismiss the case.
Jane Bland Justice
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Paccar, Inc., Cleveland MacK Sales, Inc., D/B/A Performance Kenworth, Inc., and Caterpillar, Inc. v. Ho Ho Ho Express, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paccar-inc-cleveland-mack-sales-inc-dba-performanc-texapp-2014.