Paccar, Inc., Cleveland MacK Sales, Inc., D/B/A Performance Kenworth, Inc., and Caterpillar, Inc. v. Ho Ho Ho Express, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 20, 2014·No. 01-13-00199-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued February 20, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00199-CV ——————————— PACCAR, INC., CLEVELAND MACK SALES, INC. D/B/A PERFORMANCE KENWORTH, INC., AND CATERPILLAR, INC. Appellants V. HO HO HO EXPRESS, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2008-24797

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Cleveland Mack Sales, Inc. d/b/a Performance Kenworth Inc.

and Caterpillar, Inc., have settled their disputes with appellee Ho Ho Ho Express,

Inc. and move to dismiss their appeal and vacate the trial court’s judgment. In addition, appellee Ho Ho Ho Express, Inc. and appellant PACCAR, Inc. have

settled their dispute and jointly move to dismiss PACCAR, Inc.’s appeal. We

grant both motions.

All disputes in this case having been settled, at the parties’ request, we

vacate the trial court’s judgment and dismiss the case.

Jane Bland Justice

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paccar, Inc., Cleveland MacK Sales, Inc., D/B/A Performance Kenworth, Inc., and Caterpillar, Inc. v. Ho Ho Ho Express, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Paccar, Inc., Cleveland MacK Sales, Inc., D/B/A Performance Kenworth, Inc., and Caterpillar, Inc. v. Ho Ho Ho Express, Inc. (Paccar, Inc., Cleveland MacK Sales, Inc., D/B/A Performance Kenworth, Inc., and Caterpillar, Inc. v. Ho Ho Ho Express, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.