Pac Mtl Life Ins Co v. First Repub Bnk Corp
This text of Pac Mtl Life Ins Co v. First Repub Bnk Corp (Pac Mtl Life Ins Co v. First Repub Bnk Corp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 92-1662 _____________________
PACIFIC MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
FIRST REPUBLICBANK CORPORATION, ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees. _______________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas _______________________________________________________
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(May 26, 1995)
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, REAVLEY and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We reversed the judgment of the district court with opinion
at 997 F.2d 39 (5th Cir. 1993), and the Supreme Court affirmed by
an equally divided vote. Our mandate has not been issued to the
district court. The Supreme Court has now held § 27A(b) to be an
unconstitutional breach of separation of powers. Plaut v.
Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 115 S.Ct. 1447 (1995). Under that
decision the claims of plaintiff are barred, and the district
court would be unable to do more than repeat its prior judgment.
Therefore, our opinion and judgment are vacated, and the judgment
of the district court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pac Mtl Life Ins Co v. First Repub Bnk Corp, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pac-mtl-life-ins-co-v-first-repub-bnk-corp-ca5-1995.