Pabodie v. King
12 Johns. 426
Opinion
The promise to forbear was a nudum pactum, In paying the fifty dollars, King did no more than he was legally bound to doand the promise, on the part of Pabodie, waS without any benefit to him, and occasioned no loss to King,
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pabodie v. King, 12 Johns. 426 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1815).
12 Johns. 426 (Pabodie v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lewis v. Donohue
27 Misc. 514 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Olmstead v. . Latimer
53 N.E. 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Babcock v. Kuntzsch
32 N.Y.S. 663 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Hale v. Forbis
3 Mont. 395 (Montana Supreme Court, 1879)
Hartman v. Danner
74 Pa. 36 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1873)
Reeside v. United States
2 Ct. Cl. 1 (Court of Claims, 1866)
Van Rensselaer v. Kirkpatrick
46 Barb. 194 (New York Supreme Court, 1862)
Kellogg v. . Olmsted
25 N.Y. 189 (New York Court of Appeals, 1862)
State ex rel. Clark, Dodge & Co. v. City of Davenport
12 Iowa 335 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1861)
Tryon v. Jennings
12 Abb. Pr. 33 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1861)
Converse v. Kellogg
7 Barb. 590 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Waters v. Simpson
7 Ill. 570 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1845)
Gilson v. Stewart
7 Watts 100 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1838)