Pablo Moran Garcia v. Eric Holder, Jr.

553 F. App'x 734
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 27, 2014
Docket12-73260
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 553 F. App'x 734 (Pablo Moran Garcia v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pablo Moran Garcia v. Eric Holder, Jr., 553 F. App'x 734 (9th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ley Eng Lim, a native and citizen of Malaysia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reconsider, and review de novo claims of due process violations. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Lim’s motion to reconsider based on her arguments of past and future persecution. See id. (court will not disturb the BIA’s decision unless it acted arbitrarily, irrationally, or contrary to law). In addition, even if the agency failed to properly consider Lim’s legal advice argument, we reject her due process challenge because she failed to establish prejudice. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring prejudice to prevail on a due process challenge to deportation proceedings).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gratton v. City of Tukwila
W.D. Washington, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
553 F. App'x 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pablo-moran-garcia-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2014.