Pablo, Josue Suarez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 29, 2012·No. 05-12-00256-CR·Published

Opinion

AFFIRM; Opinion issued November 29, 2012

In The Qtntrt uf pizt1i !ift1! Iitrirt uf iJixa, it 1ailzt No. 05-12-00255-CR Iso. 05-12-00256-CR

JOSUE SUAREZ PABLO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appelice

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. FI0-25375-I, F10-25376-I

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O’Neill, FitzGerald, and Lang-Miers Opinion By Justice FitzGerald

Josue Suarez Pablo pleaded guilty before a jury to two aggravated assault with a deadly

weapon offenses. See TEx. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02(a) (West 2011). After finding appellant

guilty the jury assessed punishment at fifteen and ten years’ imprisonment, respectively. On appeal,

appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without

merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief

presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect. there are no arguable

grounds to advance. See High i. State. 573 S.W.2d 807, 81 i (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).

Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, hut. he did not file a pro Se response.

We have reviewed the record and counsels brieF. See Rledcoe v. 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate courts duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeals

are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the

appeals.

We affirm the trial court’s judgments.

/ KRP4llLGFRLD JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX.R.APP. P.47 I 20255F.U05 itiitrt uf \ppaata .Wifth Oitrfrt uf Iixa at Ja11a JUDGMENT JOSUE SUAREZ PABLO, Appellant Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County. Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-12-00255-CR V. F 10-25375-I). Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald, THE STATE OF TEXAS. Appellee Justices O’Neill and Lang-Miers participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered November 29. 2012.

dERJY P4tk1ERALi3 JUSTICE (L-nurt if \pprat .FiftIi itrirt nt Lixw tt Jtilw

JUDGMENT JOSUE SUAREZ PABLO. Appellant Appeal from the Criminal I)istrict Court No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-12-00256-CR V. F10-25376-1). Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald. THE STATE OF TEXAS. Appellee Justices O’Neill and Lang-Miers participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date. the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered November 29, 2012.

JUSTI

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pablo, Josue Suarez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Pablo, Josue Suarez v. State (Pablo, Josue Suarez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)