Pablo Jimenez-Solano v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 2025·No. 3D2025-0374·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed May 28, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D25-374 Lower Tribunal No. 10-CF-497-A-K ________________

Pablo Jimenez-Solano, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Mark H. Jones, Judge.

Pablo Jimenez-Solano, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938, 940 (Fla. 2005) (“The

fact that the judicial system has no way of knowing how long the defendant

will live and therefore cannot know how long the defendant will be

incarcerated does not render a life sentence unconstitutionally indefinite. It

is abundantly clear that the Legislature, by prescribing a sentence of life

imprisonment, intends that the defendant remain in prison for the rest of his

life. The term ‘life’ is sufficiently definite so that it can be understood and

applied. There is nothing indefinite about such a sentence.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pablo Jimenez-Solano v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Pablo Jimenez-Solano v. State of Florida (Pablo Jimenez-Solano v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ratliff v. State
914 So. 2d 938 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)