Pablo Ernesto Cisneros v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 12, 2008·No. 04-08-00735-CR·Published

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00735-CR

Pablo Ernesto CISNEROS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008-CR-5993 Honorable Bert Richardson, Judge Presiding

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 12, 2008

DISMISSED

The trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-

bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule

25.2(d) provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the

right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d).

Accordingly, on October 17, 2008, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed

pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right 04-08-00735-CR

of appeal was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 2003, order); TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1.

On October 27, 2008, appellant’s appellate counsel filed a letter stating “this court has no

choice but to dismiss the appeal.” In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant’s counsel

that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pablo Ernesto Cisneros v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Pablo Ernesto Cisneros v. State (Pablo Ernesto Cisneros v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)