Pablo Enrique Perez-Gomez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
This text of 417 F. App'x 650 (Pablo Enrique Perez-Gomez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Pablo Enrique Perez-Gomez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen to seek adjustment of status based on his marriage to a United States citizen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion *651 the denial of a motion to reopen, Malhi v. INS 336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003), and we grant the petition for review and remand.
The BIA abused its discretion in concluding that the evidence Perez-Gomez presented with his June 11, 2008, motion to reopen failed to clearly and convincingly establish a bona fide marriage where the evidence demonstrated ample co-mingling of personal assets, co-habitation, and that Perez-Gomez had known his wife for at least five years prior to the marriage. See Matter of Velarde-Pacheco, 23 I. & N. Dec. 253, 256 (BIA 2002) (en banc).
We need not reach Perez-Gomez’s remaining contention. We remand to the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this disposition.
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
417 F. App'x 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pablo-enrique-perez-gomez-v-eric-h-holder-jr-ca9-2011.