PA Environ. Defense Fd., Aplt. v. Comm & Gov. Wolf

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 6, 2018
Docket4 MAP 2018
StatusPublished

This text of PA Environ. Defense Fd., Aplt. v. Comm & Gov. Wolf (PA Environ. Defense Fd., Aplt. v. Comm & Gov. Wolf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
PA Environ. Defense Fd., Aplt. v. Comm & Gov. Wolf, (Pa. 2018).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL : No. 4 MAP 2018 DEFENSE FOUNDATION, : : Appellant : Notice of Appeal from the Orders of the : Commonwealth Court dated January 8, v. : 2018 at Docket No. 228 MD 2012. : COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA, AND GOVERNOR OF : PENNSYLVANIA, TOM WOLF, IN HIS : OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS GOVERNOR, : : Appellees :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2018, the notice of appeal is quashed, as the

basis for jurisdiction identified by Appellant is infirm.

Although the litigation in the Commonwealth Court has not yet concluded,

Appellant contends that the orders that are the subject of its notice of appeal are

nonetheless final orders for purposes of 42 Pa.C.S. §723 (appeals from final orders in

matters originally commenced in the Commonwealth Court), because those orders

result in denials of requests for declaratory relief. See Jurisdictional Statement at 3.

In Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Wickett, 763 A.2d 813 (Pa. 2000),

this Court determined that an order relative to a request for declaratory relief is final and

appealable if it “either affirmatively or negatively declares the rights and duties of the parties.” Id. at 818. Here, however, the orders in question do not affirmatively or

negatively declare rights and duties. Rather, in those orders, the Commonwealth Court

determined that certain of Appellant’s requests for relief exceed the scope of a previous

remand order issued by this Court. See Memorandum Opinions and Orders dated Jan.

8, 2018, in Pa. Envtl. Defense Found. v. Commonwealth, No. 228 M.D. 2012 (Pa.

Cmwlth.) (per curiam). There is no indication, in the Commonwealth Court’s orders or in

Appellant’s jurisdictional statement, of a determination on the merits or that relief on

Appellant’s claims is otherwise foreclosed.

[4 MAP 2018] - 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Wickett
763 A.2d 813 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
PA Environ. Defense Fd., Aplt. v. Comm & Gov. Wolf, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pa-environ-defense-fd-aplt-v-comm-gov-wolf-pa-2018.