P & T Electric Co. v. Spadea

235 So. 2d 510, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2761
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 13, 1970·No. No. 39161·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Writ of certiorari having heretofore issued, argument having been heard, and the court having examined the record and briefs, it appears that the writ was improvidently issued. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this cause is discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., concur. ERVIN, C. J., dissents with opinion. ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., dissent and concur with ERVIN, C. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

P & T Electric Co. v. Spadea, 235 So. 2d 510, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2761 (Fla. 1970).

235 So. 2d 510 (P & T Electric Co. v. Spadea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United Bonding Insurance Co. v. Dura-Stress, Inc.
243 So. 2d 244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)