P. S. Saleh, Inc. v. Sinason-Teicher Inter American Grain Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

P. S. Saleh, Inc. v. Sinason-Teicher Inter American Grain Corp.

16 A.D.2d 908, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9111

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 19, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 908 (P. S. Saleh, Inc. v. Sinason-Teicher Inter American Grain Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

P. S. Saleh, Inc. v. Sinason-Teicher Inter American Grain Corp., 16 A.D.2d 908, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9111 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on May 9, 1961, granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion denied. The determination as to whether or not a binding agreement was entered into between these parties requires the determination of factual issues which can be resolved only through a trial. The communications exchanged, while containing all the essential terms of a contract, do not permit of a finding at this point as to whether or not agreement on such terms was reached. A fuller development of the facts through testimony appears to be necessary. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on May 9, 1961, granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion denied. The determination as to whether or not a binding agreement was entered into between these parties requires the determination of factual issues which can be resolved only through a trial. The communications exchanged, while containing all the essential terms of a contract, do not permit of a finding at this point as to whether or not agreement on such terms was reached. A fuller development of the facts through testimony appears to be necessary. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 908, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/p-s-saleh-inc-v-sinason-teicher-inter-american-grain-corp-nyappdiv-1962.