P & P Industries v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 644
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 3, 1958
DocketReap. Dec. 9045; Entry No. 927711
StatusPublished

This text of 40 Cust. Ct. 644 (P & P Industries v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
P & P Industries v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 644 (cusc 1958).

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff, and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Cust. Ct. 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/p-p-industries-v-united-states-cusc-1958.