P. O. B. Manufacturing Co. v. Ohio Rubber Co.

Sixth Circuit

P. O. B. Manufacturing Co. v. Ohio Rubber Co.

99 F.2d 1012, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3088

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 13, 1938

DocketNo. 8120

StatusPublished

This text of 99 F.2d 1012 (P. O. B. Manufacturing Co. v. Ohio Rubber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

P. O. B. Manufacturing Co. v. Ohio Rubber Co., 99 F.2d 1012, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3088 (6th Cir. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that a motion to docket and dismiss this appeal has been filed, accompanied by certificate of the Clerk of the District Court as required by Rule 18; and it further appearing that appellant has failed to file the record or docket the case by or before the return day and that there has been no extension of time therefor; on consideration whereof, it is ordered that the appeal be and the same is docketed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that a motion to docket and dismiss this appeal has been filed, accompanied by certificate of the Clerk of the District Court as required by Rule 18; and it further appearing that appellant has failed to file the record or docket the case by or before the return day and that there has been no extension of time therefor; on consideration whereof, it is ordered that the appeal be and the same is docketed and dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 F.2d 1012, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/p-o-b-manufacturing-co-v-ohio-rubber-co-ca6-1938.