P. H. Petry Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

P. H. Petry Co. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 447, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 340

United States Customs Court·Decided May 5, 1953·No. No. 57310; protest 98148-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

When this ease was called for trial, it was submitted on the same basis as the submission in Abstract 57282, namely, that the right to move to reopen or to set aside the submission was abandoned. An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient' to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification, the protest was overruled. (T. M. Duche & Sons v. United States, 39 C. C. P. A. 186, C. A. D. 485, certiorari denied, T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 344 U. S. 830, followed.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

When this ease was called for trial, it was submitted on the same basis as the submission in Abstract 57282, namely, that the right to move to reopen or to set aside the submission was abandoned. An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient' to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification, the protest was overruled. (T. M. Duche & Sons v. United States, 39 C. C. P. A. 186, C. A. D. 485, certiorari denied, T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 344 U. S. 830, followed.)

P. H. Petry Co. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 447, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 340 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

30 Cust. Ct. 447 (P. H. Petry Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related